this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

16426 readers
52 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

How does this compare to first past the post? Does it make any difference in outcomes?

Reading the article it sounds simpler to me, but without weighting the selections (like ranked choice) it just sounds like Dems would select every Dem, and Republicans would just select every Republican - not really changing the outcome.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First past the post inherently reinforcers a two party system as voting for a third party benefits the parties that you least want. That's the spoiler effect.

Approval voting doesn't have that problem, so alternatives can actually show up and be viable.

RCV (actually IRV) has less of a spoiler effect than FPTP but it still has a substantial "centre squeeze" effect as moderate candidates


with broad support but few first preference votes


get eliminated early.

There are much better voting systems that actually attempt to identify the Condorcet winner. The only advantage AV or IRV have over Condorcet methods is simplicity

[–] GreenTea@lemmy.org 1 points 1 month ago

Ranked pairs is better than ranked choice.

load more comments (4 replies)