this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
658 points (99.7% liked)

World News

55841 readers
1787 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Technically, the new law will raise the legal age requirement in the UK for buying cigarettes, cigars or tobacco, which is currently 18, by one year in every subsequent year, starting on January 1, 2027
  • This will effectively mean that people born on or after January 1, 2009 will never be eligible to buy them
  • Retailers will face financial penalties for selling the products to those not entitled to them
  • The government will also be empowered to impose a new registration system for smoking and vaping products entering the country, seeking to improve oversight
  • The bill will expand the UK's indoor smoking ban to a series of outdoor public spaces, for instance in children's playgrounds, outside schools and hospitals
  • Most indoor spaces that are designated smoke-free will become vape-free as well
  • Smoking in designated areas outside pubs and bars and other hospitality settings will remain permissible
  • Smoking and vaping will remain legal in people's homes
  • Vaping will become illegal in cars if someone under the age of 18 is inside, to match existing rules on smoking
  • Advertising for smoking and vaping products will be banned
  • People aged 18 or older will remain eligible to purchase vaping products, but some items targeted at younger consumers like disposable vapes have already been outlawed as part of the program
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

How about we say, smoking in your basement alone, in a house only you live in to avoid the semantics.

Cool, you're going to die or move sometime, and that smoked in house will go to someone else, which will harm them.

Your house burning down harms your community by using up emergency response resources.

Hell, the smoke from your burning house harms your neighbors. I should know, since the house halfway down the street from me caught fire and fogged up the whole neighborhood for a day. I had to take my wife to stay with her parents because the smoke was extremely irritating for her.

Other people like contractors and such can refuse to enter until the place is aired out.

Tell me you've never been in an indoor smoker's house without telling me.

Universally no one has any rights. Sort of, the opposite is also true. Universally, nothing is illegal.

That is litterally what we are discussing here. No it’s not universal anything. It’s my opinion.

Ah, so your opinion is law? Must be nice to be a despot. Am I talking with Kim? Maybe Vlad?

People who smoke do end up needing more medical care. But so do people who drink alcohol, eat red meat, or any of a large number of lifestyle choices

Yes... This was my point actually, and it takes away from your point that harming other people cannot be a right. Rights are determined by the society you are in. I don't have a right to murder because the society I'm in has said that murder is not a right. It's not any more complex than that.

What are you even arguing here? You've jumped around so much, I can't even really tell if yku remember what your position was? I think it was something like...

"Laws should be restricted to protecting people from other people, not from themselves."

Or...

"Well to be honest, there is an argument for letting you build bombs in your basement."