this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
17 points (94.7% liked)
politics
23048 readers
27 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's not what he said. He said that Biden might have bombed the nuclear facility. He said that Biden wouldn't have done the things after, including the war.
Video: https://youtu.be/NuhJS1d-F6Y
Transcript: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-the-nation-full-transcript-04-19-2026/
"But we – he said, we obliterated their nuclear program. The question then is not about what he did in June. This war we were in now did not attack the nuclear facilities again. This was not about the nuclear."
As I said, that's bombing the nuclear facility. That isn't the war that started months later.
"He was going to launch a totally different illegal war!"
That wasn't a war. The US didn't send troops to Iran or bomb any schools. The Strait of Hormuz wasn't closed. Iran got caught doing something it was hiding and accepted the outcome.
"Bombing a country isn't war!"
I don't know if you're aware of this. But bombing a sovereign nation is an act of war.
Also you have received a 1 year ban for warmongering, if you want it lifted DM me the definition of an act of war and then explain to me in 500 words or less how bombing energy assets within Iran is does not fit that definition.
coz biden is only 99% hitler
If bombing a nuclear facility is a holocaust, sure.
Cool, imma head out and bomb Three Mile Island, no problem with that?
Just to be clear, are you deliberately confusing underground enrichment facilities with power generation facilities, or do you genuinely not understand the difference? I can help you either way.
There's no skin off your back if you just accept that the source was misleading. Check primary sources. Lesson learned.
Oh, OK, so it's fine if I bomb Los Alamos, but not Three Mile Island?
Trying to understand exactly where this difference is, since it sure isn't international law.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: