this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
855 readers
430 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments


Does she seriously think it was dedicated online leftists that are totally plugged into The Discourse who who rejected Harris/Biden and not normies, who are mostly neither left nor right but have a contradictory mishmash of beliefs spanning the political spectrum, looking at the two candidates saying different versions of the same shit and deciding that it made no difference who they voted for because they took Harris at her fucking word?
She knows. But it's not about that, it's about scoring points by owning the leftists and courting controversy to keep up engagement. It's not at all unlike the typical MO of the explicitly rightwing grifters. It works. She is at this point essentially nothing more than the radlib version of the rightwing grifter and it's not a new phenomenon to her either. As Awoo mentioned:
I might also add to the list although a bit more crass,
(va*sh) who I thankfully never even hear about anymore, but who generated a similar response on this website, as seen in this very thread, with calls to limit posting about them because it feeds the grift.