this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
76 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

385 readers
1 users here now

Share tech news or talk about events in the technology field.

This community is an attempt to spread communities out more from lemmy.world and lemmy.ml, so its less centralized and using the advantages of the fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Annie Altman accused her brother of sexually abusing and raping her between 1997 and 2006 at the family home in suburban Clayton, Missouri, starting when she was three and he ​was 12. She said the "last acts of sexual abuse and rape" occurred ​when Sam Altman was an adult. He is now 40.

They always go for the kids dont they. I dont know how credible this Annie Altman is, the family says she is mentally ill. But they would say that, wouldnt they.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So because you think she can’t remember being raped as a child, you’re dismissing the whole thing? What age are you accepting rape-memories from? Because the rape allegedly continued well into her teens. I think she’s allowed to remember that.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How is this a strawman argument?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because I'm not dismissing the whole thing. That notion is being conjured and argued against (a strawman argument). I specifically said he should be investigated and prosecuted. It's the pre-5yo part that weakens the case and should be dropped, and we shouldn't pussyfoot around that if we want a solid case (a judicial one and in the court of public opinion).

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with your reasoning. Personally I would describe it as being a weak case rather than a strawman which usually involves misrepresentation.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The strawman is the person I replied to arguing against dismissing the entire case based on the claim of three-year-olds having useful memories. And rudely, I might add. I never said that the entire case should be dismissed. They made that up. That was the strawman.