this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42360 readers
52 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And what specifically is it that you disagree with, but I'm just a software engineer.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

In à set a planned condition you don't have the impact of random events. A perfectly fine program can broke easily because input data don't match expected input. I join the other guy sating that not a huge feat, that a feat but on the same scale of solid state battery or the folding cloth robot. Pretty but not real life usable yet so not so usefull. I get that you like the final idea. I am myself wetting myself about the LG robot which was folding t-shirts at CES2026

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You absolutely do have the impact of random events when you're doing anything in the physical world. You have wind, uneven ground, variations in weight distribution, and so on. That's what makes this sort of stuff so difficult in practice. All the tiny little errors quickly add up, so you can't just match expected input. You have to have a dynamic system that can adjust on the fly to the sensory data. Dealing with stuff like an uneven bed or a tilted surface is a completely separate problem of having a good enough world model internally.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I may be not knoweldable enough in AI but doesn't a bed on which you have to fold thing part of the world model ? If I understand that a break through in the mécanisme which do micro ajustement of the derive.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, the bed and the environment in general is part of the world model. What I mean is that's part of object identification and recognition of what objects to use for what task, etc. It's a separate concern from dexterity. Think of it this way. If you're thirsty, and you pick up a cup. You're consciously thinking about moving your hand to grab the cup and bring it to your mouth. That's what the world model is concerned with. You're not aware of every individual muscle movement and all the micro adjustments that need to happen in order for the task to be completed. And that's what the running illustrates. It's the dexterity of the system in dealing with feedback from the world and making these adjustments in response.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I see, thanks for taking to time for explaining.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago