this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
200 points (95.9% liked)
Not The Onion
21216 readers
849 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The goal of prediction markets is to try to surface an "expert" opinion. People who are betting there are presumably deciding their position based on polling data, along with other factors such as how likely they think Orban or others are to cheat the results and how likely events that could change the polling numbers are to occur.
People who decry the "insider trading" that happens in prediction markets are missing that insider trading is exactly the point of something like this. If there's someone inside Orban's inner circle who knows something nobody else does that makes them more certain of a particular outcome here, they would be rewarded by making their knowledge "public" by placing bets on the prediction and as a result pushing the odds in some direction based on that knowledge.
There are people who gamble on these markets without any special research or inside knowledge to guide them, just going by their guts, and the goal of prediction markets is that over time these people will lose their money and stop gambling like this. They're not contributing information and are "punished" for their interference.
The goal of "prediction" markets is to make money for the people who operate them. But sometimes they're right anyway.
Yes, but they're set up so that the best way to make that money is to make correct "bets" by whatever means. It's not like a poker game where the best way to make money is to calculate odds and understand the psychology of the other players, it's specifically "you make money if you know more about the thing being bet on than other participants."
As I understand it, the psychology of other participants does come into it in much the same way it does in a poker game or the stock market. One doesn't strictly bet on the outcome of events — in all such markets that I heard about positions can be taken up and then sold for profit as opinion shifts, before the predictions are ever constrained by actual outcomes.
Sure, but as the market's resolution date approaches that's increasingly a gamble. "Suckers" should be harder and hard to find as the outcome becomes more certain. The election's less than a week away now so I would expect vibe-based participants to be starting to lose their shirts at this point.
It's gambling all the way through, but sure enough there's some amount of information to be found in the way people are betting.