this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
425 points (80.1% liked)
Political Memes
11592 readers
899 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So you have an average normal politician running against literally Hitler. And people vote for literally Hitler.
And you don't think the problem is the people voting for literally Hitler?
Don't get me wrong, the US voting system is also bad. But that is really, really not the main problem here...
IMO the bigger problem is that the "average normal politician" managed to be so bad that voters didn't feel motivated to vote against Hitler.
This should have been a slam dunk - and there were literally a number of easy ways to motivate voters, like promising to stop the ongoing genocide the country is funding. But when given the choice between "letting Hitler win" and "stopping the genocide", Harris and the entire DNC leadership chose to let Hitler win.
Isn't that deeply fucked up?
It was a slam dunk. I still know trump supporters who think everything negative said about him is a lie. Why did this never happen in human history before (an unrelenting smear campaign running for over a decade against an innocent man)? Meh I dunno something about woke.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Harris's win obviously wasn't a slam dunk, she lost.
yeah but she COULD have won retroactively if we browbeat people who already vote blue for the next ten years about it
Yeah... Were totally mad at people who voted blue. You're so right. 😬
I meant she was the obvious choice to anyone with >3 working neurons.
She was! But since a rather large portion of the US public seems to have 0-3 neurons, it's not enough to be the obvious choice for everyone else.
Harris and her campaign knew this. They had polls clearly showing that she's so bad at motivating voters that she'll likely lose.
No, it was the voters fault that Harris decided to fish for the republican vote by shefting more to the right in her rhetoric. Those stupid people should have voted blue no matter who!
all cops are bastards after all.
your whole comment is provably false. claming the attack on the 7. was a genocide is laughably false.
do not forget that Israel has made gaza a concentration camp long before that time.
I linked sources. You spew bullshit.
you linked the wikipedia article. it's allegations. if you had read it you would first notice that the allegations are about "intent" and genocide. As the power imbalance is laughably.
The empire long called the rebellion murderes with genocidal intent. When the rebellion hit what they could, the empire killed their own to avoid hostages. The empire then told all that the rebels had murdered babies and made up other lies to make the rebels look bad.
So are the current allegations against Israel, right?
To be more than allegations, there would have to be a ICC judgement in either case, I think?
Just because you are laughably weak, it does not mean you can't do evil.
lol. if its a genocide then US has done one just now when bombing a school
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Palestine?wprov=sfla1
"uhm palestinians can do gencide too, i promise they are evil tooo" lol. imagine being a shill for evil nazi empire 🤷
Do you even know what a logical argument is?
logic is a feeling, and is just as good a basis for argumentation as anger is.
also. I support hamas. I would have been worse than them if I had to grow up in concentration camp gaza and see the world do nothing. seeing the zionists kill our children, steal our water, demolish homes and wells and kill crops.
Lmao
Ah, you are OK with terrorism. This is my total lack of surprise.
and you just sit on the sidelines saying "uhm actsjually both sides bad"
Terrorist is just the other side of rebellion.
I did actually say that Israel's initial invasion of Gaza was legally and morally justified...
I don't feel like I am just saying "both sides bad". I point out specific actions to be good or bad.
right. but you are ignoring the entire history that came before oktober 7. the decades of injustice, occupation, murders and so forth.
what else can the palestinian people do other than fight back?
edit: to add and clarify.
if 7. oktober justifies Israel going into gaza and doing all their shit there - then the earlier history between israel and palestine would justify attacks against israel.
ah. right forgot you beilive zionist lies.
The oslo accords were breached by Israel. they have not kept to a single agreement ever reached. The goal of hamas is no israeli state, but a palestinian state, in which jews can live as well.
but lol you keep saying "but hamas bad too, and cant solve it" as if hamas started this.
Israel created hamas. it would not have existed without them. Empire creates so-called "terrorists"
Thought terminating cliche, nothing unexpected from this user.
"I can excuse genocide but I draw the line at scary terrorism*"
*Terrorism is when brown people fight back
And you're obviously ok with genocide, apartheid, and settler-colonialism. In comparison to that, "terrorism" isn't that bad. Especially when it's only "terrorism" when the victims fight back.
A wiki page listing people who have called it a genocide doesn't exactly prove that it was one, and regardless the israelis have long been oppressing the people in gaza, including illegally capturing land by force for many years, so them striking back would be less a genocide and more an act of war, a warcrime in this instance as they largely attacked civillians, but so does israel which is why both the leader of hamas and israel are wanted war criminals
It's like saying the slave revolts in ancient rome were genocides because the slaves were attacking romans, who else were they supposed to attack? And could you really blame them for striking back at their oppressors?
Ideally it would have been resolved peacefully but the international community turned a blind eye to what was happening, and israel sure as hell wasn't about to stop out of the kindness of their heart
“Gaza did a genocide in Israel” is actually fucking insane.
It's not insane, it's a rhetorical tactic. "OK, fine, Israel is doing a genocide - but they did it to us first!".
That is not how it started shut the fuuuck up.
Average normal politicians don’t give Hitler weapons to commit genocide.
What do you mean? Hitler committed genocide, so Hitler was given the weapons. And Hitler was given the authority for those weapons through a democratic process, by way of average normal politicians (mainly Paul von Hindenburg, specifically).
I mean Netanyahu is Hitler and they were giving him weapons. That’s not what normal does.
Funding a genocide is not normal.
If you had this system in Europe you would not like the results. Best outcome: 200 years of middle of the road conservative shit Christian party
Yeah, I agree. If this can ever happen all you can really say is that us culture is cancer.