this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
1067 points (99.5% liked)

memes

20829 readers
1934 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Decq@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

I think the main reason most companies choose closed source is because management gets a hard-on for the thought of having someone to complain to. If they can't call meetings with someone responsible and demand a quick fix, what use do they still have? All you can with open source is fix it yourself or create an issue. Neither requires a manager.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What? No!

The point is that it is impossible to have support of every single software you use in-house. So it is better to outsource it to companies who have specialized support on hand 24/7, and who have been solving those kinds of issues every single day of the year. They don't need to flip through the documentation in order to solve it.

In companies, a problem that causes the entire company from being unable to generate profit for 24hours costs way more than a support contract.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

That's exactly my point?

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 5 points 9 hours ago

Many open source have paid support

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Correct. Also, they need someone to delegate the responsibility to. They are mainly concerned with not being held responsible for any potential fuck-ups. If they can say "the vendor did it" they can deflect the blame. Unfortunately that's how making a career in the corporate world works for the vast majority of people. You advance by avoiding getting blamed for mistakes, not by brilliance or competence.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 8 hours ago

And then after they demanded a quick fix it will be swiftly delivered in next decade

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

A main issue, according to my non-software related work-life experience is also: liability reasons.

Being able to legally blame someone else when shit goes wrong is a very motivating driver for executive decisions.