this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
47 points (96.1% liked)

Firefox

22709 readers
21 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Hmmm not keen on letting Brave censor the web for me. And why the hell would Brave give Waterfox money if there's no telemetry?

Idgaf about allowing search ads by default on their search partner, whatever fine.

But the Brave part smells really really bad, wasn't their ad blocker inserting ads of its own?

[–] catscape@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

read the article. they're using brave's open source adblock library; brave isn't paying them to do this.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Strange to frame it as a financial sustainability decision then.

[–] filt@thelemmy.club 19 points 4 weeks ago

The financial decision part is regarding search ads with Startpage. Again, read the article.