this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
310 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

15450 readers
563 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 41 points 23 hours ago (4 children)
[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

You don't hear about it? I constantly hear about people dying in Teslas. And the car is a joke for years now, it can't become a joke any harder.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

After some googling, the "Why?!" in the image seems to be completely bullshit, though.

  1. Electric cars have a way lower amount of deaths from fire than petrol cars. So why would there be outrage about Tesla fire safety?

  2. The comparison in the image also completely ignores number of cars on the street, total miles driven. All car models will have fire deaths.

  3. The outrage about the Ford Pinto was because it was a known specific defect which was covered up (fuel tank rupturing when rear ended), more than the number of deaths in itself. As far as I can tell, the number of fire deaths were actually not extraordinarily high for the Pinto. Hence comparing this not especially high number to Tesla for outrage purposes is meaningless.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There's absolutely zero chance that Tesla isn't covering up stuff right now about the safety of their vehicles. Zero.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 hours ago

source: c'mon bro, like, c'mon

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

it was a known specific defect which was covered up

It was not covered up, the Pinto had the same fuel tank design as other manufacturers, it's just at that period of time, Ford had more cash.

Lawyers do not sue to justice, they sue for cash.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

This isn’t true. Read up on some details of the lawsuit. Although Ford had designs overseas with fuel tank behind the rear axle, not one model by Ford or others had 9” or less crush space like the Pinto. They had meetings and reports to discuss crash test results that showed the Pinto vulnerable to fuel spillage based on proposed federal crash tests. They decided to defer any improvements until 1976 to accrue $20 million in savings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimshaw_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The 1937 New London School gas explosion killed 295 students and teachers.

[–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

New London School is joke to you?

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Your attempts to make bad guys out of EVs and me are pathetic.

[–] pfried@reddthat.com -2 points 19 hours ago

Whoosh. Reread the thread, champ.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago

Because, for some reason, people actually like teslas?