this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
97 points (96.2% liked)

politics

29286 readers
2176 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paramount Skydance CEO has repeatedly cited the statistic when laying out the approach that CBS News and potentially CNN would take

During an early March appearance on CNBC, the Paramount Skydance chief executive, David Ellison, cited a statistic he has come to rely on when laying out his editorial approach for CBS News and, potentially, the cable network he has made a deal to own, CNN. The young media mogul said the networks will prioritize reaching “the 70% of Americans and really around the world that identify as center-left, as center-right”.

The idea of an unaddressed center ground is a powerful talking point. In a world of increasingly partisan politics, Ellison’s promise to address the unheard, silent majority packs a punch – and fits nicely with the approach of one of his most high-profile lieutenants, the heterodox commentator Bari Weiss.

Unfortunately, it appears that Ellison’s 70% figure is not supported by publicly available polling data on the ideological orientation of Americans.

A recent YouGov survey – conducted last fall and published in January – found that only 40% of US adult citizens identify as “center-left”, “center” or “center-right”, not 70%.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

according to Gallup’s data from 2025, more than half of Americans – 54% – identify as either Democrats or Republicans, with another 35% characterized as “Republican-leaning independents” or “Democratic-leaning independents”. Pew data has the number of self-identified Republicans or Democrats at 59%.

Ok, but what does that mean? "Republican" and "Democrat" are not ideologies, they're political parties. And very broad parties, at that. Because of our de facto two party system, both parties usually try to be "big tents." So neither party ever has exclusively one ideology.

What is the guiding ideology of the Republican party (or rather, what was it before the party became the cult of Trump)? What is the guiding ideology of the Democratic party? I think it used to be Neoliberalism, or "Third Way" Liberalism. But what is it today? Is it still Third Way Liberalism, like during the Bill Clinton era? Or is it more traditional Social Democracy?

In a lot of ways, the Third Way was meant to be a compromise between Neoliberals and Social Democrats, but are either of those sides willing to compromise today? Should they compromise? It seems to me there are aspects of Neoliberalism and Social Democracy that are mutually exclusive. For instance, Neoliberalism usually wants lower taxes, but Social Democrats want a strong social safety funded by a progressive tax system, which usually means higher taxes, at least for income earners near the top. Well, taxes can't be both lower and higher at the same time, so which is it? You can compromise and just lower taxes a little, and have a smaller safety net, but while compromise seems like a good thing, it usually just ends up with watered down policies that no one is fully happy with.

So where are the majority of Americans, ideologically? Is there a majority ideological consensus? If so, what is it?

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So where are the majority of Americans, ideologically? Is there a majority ideological consensus? If so, what is it?

The majority of Americans are non-ideological in that they either align with the ideology of the state or have an incoherent hodge-podge of heterodox ideas.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You're probably right. So if most Americans are either non-ideological or heterodox, what would the orthodox ideology be?

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Currently in flux, but it has been neoliberalism. Trump's second term has been shifting the orthodoxy towards neoconservative fascism. When I say that someone is non-ideological what I mean is that they do not have a personal commitment to any particular ideology, but that doesn't mean they don't have an alignment. People who don't have ideological commitments often align with the state and have a loosely connected set of orthodox views, and if they don't then they instead have a loosely connected set of heterodox views.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree. I wonder what will follow. Neoconservativism and Fascism are both failed systems. It's only a matter of time before they fail this time, too. I wonder if the failure of Neoconservativism/Fascism will lead to so many crises that there will be a collapse of the current global order, specifically US hegemony. Could that lead to the Chinese model becoming the new preferred paradigm?

And as far as here in the US, well, maybe when this is an over there won't be a US anymore. But if there is, I wonder what the next dominant ideology will be.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't dare speculate lest I end up as crazy as Professor Jiang.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Lol, yeah he's quite the prognosticator. He also seems to be getting pretty popular, which I think is a little concerning.

[–] DillDough@lemmy.zip 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Look man, we have a right wing party and an ultra far right wing party...1/3 of us think the right wing party is so far left it's either communist or "national socialist" and majority of the rest of us consider that right wing party to be reasonably left/progressive. You really can't figure out where we lean ideologically?

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

"Right-wing" isn't an ideology. I agree that most Americans are right of socialism, and probably even social democracy, but that encompasses a lot of ideologies.