this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
115 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

83502 readers
2866 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
115
Inside the Systemd Age Verification Debate: Developer Responds to Criticism (itsfoss.com)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I draw the line at when a third party internet-connected service is doing validation of ID. Let’s be honest though, I strongly believe such a thing isn’t possible on a FOSS operating system environment unless they could control what was bootable on the device at a firmware level, enforce signatures to ensure that you couldn’t boot something unrestricted, remove the ability to be root, and block LD_PRELOAD so signals couldn’t be faked. There’s probably more ways to circumvent that.

What I’m trying to say is real ID verification on Linux would be awfully hard to implement, and I guarantee you, nobody would put up with it. They’d fork to a version that doesn’t have it immediately as a protest. Right now, we’re considering implementing something akin to the date pickers that were ubiquitous when signing up for internet services in the early 2000s where it’s just an honor system.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Again, that isn’t at all what it being talked about here. You’re making up a fictitious thing to be mad at.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You're trying to constrain the conversation to not include the overall push towards exactly what I'm talking about. This specific action was in anticipation of what I'm talking about. You're naive if you think this is where they're stopping

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You’re talking about a collective “they” and the ultimate result of a whole bunch of slippery slope bullshit.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's not slippery slope when places are ALREADY implementing similar things, and there's multiple companies (like palantir) heavily involved in surveillance on a national/international scale that are pushing for this.

(Oh lOoK iTs tHe sLipPeRySloPe)[https://piefed.zip/c/technology/p/1343552/group-pushing-age-verification-requirements-for-ai-turns-out-to-be-sneakily-backed-by-open#post_replies]