this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
596 points (97.3% liked)

Just Post

1422 readers
715 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.

Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.

Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 58 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We need the 91% top-tier tax bracket.

We also need capital gains taxed at the same (or greater) rate as income tax.

We also need a 1-2% annual tax on registered securities, payable not in dollars, but in shares of the security. No more than 1% of total-traded volume will consist of liquidated shares. Up to $10 million worth of securities will be exempt from this tax, if held by a natural person.

[โ€“] Airfried@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need the 91% top-tier tax bracket.

Why stop there? A 91% top-tier tax bracket got us here. Let's make it 100% this time for good measure.

[โ€“] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Abandoning the 91% top tier rate is what got us in this mess. "Trickle Down" actually worked when there were consequences to not spending your excess earnings.

91%, 100%, 150%, 10,000%, doesn't matter: nobody paid it. The point of it was to get people to avoid it. What they had to do to avoid the top-tier tax rate is what drove the economy.

[โ€“] Airfried@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My point was to de facto criminalize billionaires. The law would state you are not allowed to own this much. Full stop. People would very quickly see obscene wealth much more critically if it was a crime.

[โ€“] Dragomus@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Frankly, I'd say start with anyone being valued over $1B, including stocks, locked funds, properties and international assets etc. should have everything over that $1B taken away and divided for proper causes benefitting the populace.

On top of that they yearly pay a fair percentage of their assessed value as taxes. Also, no interest free loans for these people, nor drowning their possessions in loans to companies or whatnot. Stocks in companies are both directly taxed and under yearly taxation.

The US already taxes it's citizens abroad so yhe above shouldn't be too hard to implement.

[โ€“] fishy@lemmy.today 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Just treat greed as a mental illness. Lock those sociopaths up

[โ€“] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, but we would need to definitively define what greed is in a way that is consistently enforceable. Maybe we should make it mandatory for them to like have mental stability check ups done by a third party.

[โ€“] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

The definition is easy: if their net worth exceeds 10 million (locked in as a ratio with the minimum wage, so it grows with it).

Get that rich, get locked up.

[โ€“] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

But then what incentives would the creators of the soul-crushing-machines have to invent the next soul-crushing-machine???

[โ€“] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We also need capital gains taxed at the same (or greater) rate as income tax.

Can we amend that so the poors are a bit exempt? That could be useful to uplift people.

[โ€“] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Income tax is already progressive, with "the poors" already exempt. Treating cap gains the same as income tax would exempt "the poors" in the same way.

Taxing cap gains at a lower rate than income is an insult to labor.

Income tax is already progressive

Lol. Clearly you aren't in the US, where income tax doesn't mean shit to the wealthy.

[โ€“] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Adding to that, why not have capital gains tax be progressive tax brackets too? That way you don't disencentivize poorer people investing and have high rates for wealthy people.

[โ€“] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Progressive inheritance tax capped at some reasonable value.

[โ€“] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Inheritance tax doesn't even apply for the first $3M

[โ€“] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

Great. Make that the cap.