this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
44 points (81.4% liked)

Technology

83502 readers
2898 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What stops someone from validating an account, then posting using a bot?

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

They're too busy protecting nazis to be good at the rest of their "job."

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article basically says that posting using the API will get posts labeled as "[App]". That's what it boils down to. They even talk about human accounts using AI to write posts.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you can connect to a site using a browser, so can a bot.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, but what does that have to do with my comment? (edit: they explained the context below)

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I’m just saying that the proposed solution will be ineffective at filtering bots, but create a false sense of security.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Ah, gotcha, I hadn't caught that between the lines. :)

Yeah, I think it'll be pretty trivial to get around. Anyone wanting to post automatically just has to sign up manually, do whatever checking, then post using some sort of scraper i.e. directly to the site rather than via the API. Which probably a lot of bots are doing now rather than bothing to set up the API.... heh

I guess it's good that they're trying to do a positive thing (ignoring all the shit they're doing outside of it), but it's probably not going to help much.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’ll be much more annoying to automate but can’t the ais just use computers now?

Much more expensive to manage bot farms though

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It’s trivial to automate browser clicks like that with AI these days.

But yeah, more expensive than an API call.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't necessarily support this, but I feel like this at least adds a barrier to a single person setting up hundreds of bot accounts easily. Similar to locking your doors, it just adds friction to those that would otherwise not put a lot of effort in. People can still break into your house/run a bot farm, but this makes it just that much more difficult. Again, I don't really support doing this, and it's definitely not being done for user's benefit, but it will likely have some impact on botting.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

but I feel like this at least adds a barrier to a single person setting up hundreds of bot accounts easily

Cheap labor from scam centers in India has entered the chat

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Let me be the first to downvote you shit take.