this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

83261 readers
3082 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
56
Judge Allows BitTorrent Seeding Claims Against Meta, Despite Lawyers 'Lame Excuses' (torrentfreak.com)
submitted 2 days ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In an effort to gather material for its LLM training, Meta used BitTorrent to download pirated books from Anna’s Archive and other shadow libraries. According to several authors, Meta facilitated the infringement of others by "seeding" these torrents. This week, the court granted the authors permission to add these claims to their complaint, despite openly scolding their counsel for "lame excuses" and "Meta bashing."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While the BitTorrent angle is not new, the authors previously only included a ‘distribution’ claim based on direct copyright infringement. This claim has a higher evidence standard, as it typically requires evidence that the infringer shares a whole work with a third party.

Since BitTorrent transfers break up files into smaller chunks before they are shared, it might be difficult to prove that a whole work is shared.

If the case sides with Meta, I can see future defenses pouring in "Ya, see your honor - I'm innocent cause I only seeded 99.99% of that movie."

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"My client is innocent because he never seeds the NFO file your honor."

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Oh thank fuck

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 8 points 2 days ago

The birth of the doNOTseed.txt