i appreciate the response. we can agree to disagree about one turkish agitpropist, but i'm going to point out that you didn't answer maybe the most important question. are you out there? do you have more effective agitprop tech that i need to know about that the "entryists" are denying me somehow? is the class-consciousness of the people being limited by hasan piker in a manner that has you banging your head into a wall?

because otherwise i have no idea why i should trust your judgment on when agitprop is opportunist a la Kautsky or meeting the people where they are in order to continue raising class consciousness bit by bit, action by action a la Lenin. especially to such a degree that you can conclude now that they are like Kautsky. i would say that the people in the imperial core are much less developed even than those proletarians that were being organized by Lenin and the social democratic party in 1902 at the time of "what is to be done?" and therefore agitprop for internet liberals is still going to be relatively entryist. Kautsky didn't split so much from Lenin that they could not be comrades until after the revolution had commenced over 15 years later.