cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16451158
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
923 points (90.9% liked)
Political Memes
11810 readers
1345 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Anyone who pretends like these two things are mutually exclusive, is either a fascist, or the fascist's useful idiot.
Or someone without any useful context who spend their entire day arguing on lemmy. That's the case with 90% of the people on Lemmy who tell someone not to vote.
"That’s the case with 90% of the people on Lemmy who tell someone not to vote."
can you substantiate it or are you just vibe-commenting?
You can isolate people's reasoning clearly enough.
it sounds like you're making it up
It sounds like it's something that's unfalsifiable in the absence of active disagreement and since it doesn't fit with your idea of the world you'd rather attack it.
a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
I never argued that you couldn't.
you haven't argued anything at all. you e made an unsubstantiated claim
Also called an anecdote, an experience I was sharing with someone else, not to say I have conducted an experiment of scientific rigor and have arrived at this result but to say in my time here I have recognized this trend. Only I don't speak like that because it's plenty clear from context. Then you attacked it with your own anecdote. So I think the more interesting question is why it bothered you so much that I often find people engage in politics without useful context.
I haven't given any anecdotes. I'm asking you to substantiate your claim
It wasn't a claim it was an anecdote, it's a mismatch in communication expectations and I understand the confusion. I stand by my lived experience and expect it to be treated as nothing more than it is.
That being said you shouldn't look for rigor in social media or get your facts from there if you treat the comments as you seem to, which is to say expecting scientific rigor that's bad practice. If I was making such a claim I would link to a primary source but again the is a casual conversation on social media. I think you expectations may be onerous for the medium.
edit: whoops didn't mean to reply twice thought the first one didn't post