this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
125 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

83098 readers
3543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
125
European Union finds PornHub, Stripchat, XNXX and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act for allowing minors to access their services (ec.europa.eu)
submitted 20 hours ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The European Commission preliminarily found Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA) for failing to protect minors from being exposed to pornographic content on their services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In that case: sorry to blow up on you. I have seen to many comments on here claiming these things while being 100% serious. I just saw your comment and incidentally had time to write the above for once, so, here we are.

I agree that there's no way to completely cut teens off from porn. Your torrent example is perfectly demonstrating this.

But I also do not understand the current outrage at anything trying to improve the situation, even when it's not some stupid "scan your face" scheme.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It's mostly just that I don't want the government to know precisely which websites I visit. Nor do I want the the porn sites to know exactly who I am.

Let me have my privacy. I've been watching porn since I was 12 or 13 and absolutely would've figured out a way to do it even if there'd been age restrictions because I was horny af. Nothing bad has happened to me because of it. Perhaps a mild addiction to masturbation unless I'm having sex but that hurts literally nobody. Worse case scenario I last a little too long occasionally.

Block pornhub and teens will find much seedier sites.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It’s mostly just that I don’t want the government to know precisely which websites I visit. Nor do I want the the porn sites to know exactly who I am.

I understand, I want that too. It's easily possible though (just one example for a scheme):

  • you visit porn site
  • porn site sends your browser a random nonce
  • you/browser tell government service: sign this if I'm >18
  • government signs the nonce + a timstamp to prove freshness
  • your browser forwards the result to the porn site
  • porn site can verify signature per standard public certificate chains
  • now porn site has proof that you are >18, but knows nothing else about you; and government only knows that you wanted proof that you are an adult, but not for what site or purpose you wanted to prove that

Alternatively, if we go the "device has an age bracket field browsers access" route, it's even simpler, and just as if not more privacy preserving.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

That already tells the government that I'm accessing porn because why else would I need to confirm I'm an adult online? And why would they implement it in a somewhat private manner if it could be implemented in a privacy-infringing manner?