this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
145 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

15376 readers
15 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The officer concluded that Sacco “was experiencing an episode of road rage which caused her to actually and intentionally increase the speed of her vehicle and strike (the victim) against her will.”

Police arrested Sacco on charges of leaving the scene of a crash involving injuries and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon.

Why not attempted murder?

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Because it would be the easiest way to lose the case. Attempted murder in the legal sense and common sense are two wildly different things

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 33 points 3 days ago

Regrettably accurate. It does often feel as if car murderers get off really easily in the US.

If I was going to be an assassin, all I'd need was an average truck.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This always confuses me because if you're being arrested and you so much as sneeze on the officer you're gonna get charged with attempted murder of a peace officer.

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago

It's usually assault on a peace officer. They are laws written for law enforcement protection and sometimes apper to ignore self defence or resistance as a automatic response. So if a cop assaults you you can't assault back.

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would love to live in a society where police are genuinely and unironically referred to as peace officers. It would be a step in the right direction—the destination of course being a society where they need not exist, at least in their current form.

Unpopular ^(or popular but unspoken) opinion: Despite what the ACAB crowd would proclaim, I believe there are plenty of officers out there who may deserve such a title already, for trying their best in spite of being painfully aware of the system's shortcomings and the public's perception thereof.

[–] Fluke@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are not "plenty". I will concede that there are, in theory, a few.

Those that join the police force with such positive things in heart and mind either get ground down and quit, a burned out cynical husk of a person, or get corrupted.

Very few have the diplomatic skills as well as the temerity to be able to stick it out. Those very few that can and do are working within a system that is at best so obsessed with measurable statistics there is no leeway for officer discretion, and at worst actively designed to incarcerate as many as possible.

Which version of the system you get exposed to is mostly a matter of one's skin colour and apparent wealth, which strongly suggests the number of "good ones" is so vanishingly small as to be statistically insignificant.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I guess over there there isn't a law particularly meant for addressing causing death by driving dangerously?

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Because to get a warrant for an arrest the police have to pretty conclusively show something is true*. The prosecutor can always add charges before trial. This gives them time and an excuse to collect evidence without allowing the suspect to flee.

*Unless that person is black.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I DON'T WANNA HAVE TO DO THE THING THAT NO ONE IS MAKING ME DO!

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 3 days ago

Because you can’t murder people when you’re behind the wheel, driving is sacrosanct.