this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
26 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23247 readers
245 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
Wakmrow@hexbear.net
26
Militarily, how viable could a revolution in the US possibly be? (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 day ago by bunnossin@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Maybe this is too fedposty (and let me know if it is), but I've been thinking about this a lot, especially with how things are going in Iran. It seems like modern warfare is basically just "my drones strike your drones", and if either side has drones free to not strike other drones, they can instantly kill whoever they like. With this in mind, is it even really possible for a revolution in the US to escalate into a civil war without simply being air-superiority'd into oblivion with modern sensors? Is guerilla war viable anymore? The main counterpoint I can think of to this possibility is that the US military is A: incompetent and B: mostly a colonial garrison force, but I don't know.

(And yeah, I know a revolution in the US would have a whole laundry list of prerequisites and is significantly hindered by the fact it can't be tied with anti-imperial nationalism. I'm talking strictly in terms of if it actually happened.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 8 points 22 hours ago

Aside from this being militarily simplistic, you're thinking about this in the wrong way by considering it mainly as a "our guys try to kill your guys" military conflict.

If we had a properly organized militant labor movement, the most important weapon we would have is that the capitalists need labor to keep their machine running. By denying them that labor, they become a much softer target to the point of imploding in an extreme case. This is part of the reason for that slogan "become ungovernable."