this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
756 points (95.0% liked)

Comic Strips

22944 readers
3095 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Guns in America, to me, are a perfect representation of the fallacy of personal responsibility.

Let’s take a scenario that, while tragic, has happened in the USA; a small boy of less than 6 finds a gun, plays with it, and shoots their baby sibling. The common refrain from responsible gun owners is: “You should’ve kept it locked and trained your family to use it responsibly!”

But who’s “you”? The shooter? The victim? One was killed and one was traumatized. The parent? They didn’t suffer nearly as much as the others.

So it’s not even the only issue where I hear “We need parents to be more responsible!” but simply saying that won’t change the number of drunk deadbeat parents putting zero effort into their children; and potentially leading other real human beings to suffer for it.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

You should’ve kept it locked and trained your family to use it responsibly

I don't get it. Why not just have it locked away in some kind of safe? Why the need for training?

[–] CascadiaRo@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In terms of assigning responsibility, this is an easy one.

“You” refers to the firearm’s owner. Firearm ownership comes with a high degree of responsibility. It means knowing and following the four rules, at least two of which must be broken at the same time for someone to get hurt. It means maintaining a reasonable degree of control over that firearm at all times, whether it’s on your person or being stored.

If anyone is “finding” a firearm, reasonable precautions were not taken to secure that firearm.

These cases all boil down to gross negligence on the owner’s part. Legally and logically, the owner should be the one to suffer the consequences.

Unfortunately, in a lot of cases, the incident gets treated as a “tragedy” and legal consequences do not get applied.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

So yeah, haul the parent to court, and then sit the traumatized child down and tell them "Good news! The law has correctly identified the negligent party in this incident. You may be eligible for up to $1mil in damages!"

while he's sitting there crying over his dead sibling. Better, you want to extend this case to a school shooting? Go announce to 30 parents that "We worked out who is negligent!" You discover common, repeating human ignorance after the fact, and nobody is saved.

The fact that some people in our society are negligent is an expected outcome. That's why your friend will yell at you one night when you take his car keys away, and then thank you the next day when he's sober. The point is that society can plan better for that negligence, rather than just pat themselves on the back for spotting it.

[–] currycourier@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I think there is a distinction between responsibility and blame. I don't think blame is easy to assign here, but responsibility is, the parents are responsible. Doesn't really change anything after the fact, but I also wouldn't say that the idea of personal responsibility is a fallacy. But just saying that people should be more responsible doesn't actually change the situation, you're right.