this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
219 points (99.5% liked)

Europe

10723 readers
1583 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.K. government on Tuesday introduced new rules requiring developers to install heat pumps and solar panels in all new homes across England, in policymakers’ latest response to the economic fallout of the Iran conflict.

U.K. ministers say the Iran war and the largest supply disruption in the history of the oil market reinforces the need to leverage clean power as an energy security tool.

The Future Homes Standard β€” a set of new-build regulations for England from 2028 β€” will establish requirements to ensure homes are built with on-site renewable electricity generation, the majority of which is expected to be provided by solar power.

The rules will also see homes built with low-carbon heating, such as heat pumps and heat networks.

The government added that plug-in solar panels, which homeowners can install on balconies, would be available within shops over the coming months.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 5 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Seems wasteful not to cover one whole roof with panels (possibly replacing the sheet metal entirely) and connect them to one big inverter to power four homes. Splitting the needed amount of panels and inverters for every house wastes lots of installation work and makes every roof uglier. 4Uu7JKGo8bMNBrW.jpeg
Seems wasteful to require solar panels on homes shaded by trees or aligned the wrong way.

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

"Possibly replacing the sheet metal entirely" tells me you've never been to the UK...

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why not? look at all the sheet metal roofs in the picture!

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Those are probably roof tiles.

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 5 points 7 hours ago

The comment you were replying to was almost certainly being sarcastic, least not due to the exclamation mark instead of a question mark.

That too is a sign of Britishness! :)

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Is the material relevant here? My point is, if the whole roof is covered by panels, you don't need the redundant roof under the panels anymore.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 hours ago

Real answer is that solar panels themselves are barely structural, commonly relying on a steel or aluminium frame for support, they don't offer any insulation and are easily damaged.

Ceramic roof tiles are a far better material that's already widely used, so they mount the solar panels to the wooden frames with holes through the tiles themselves, maintaining the insulation of the tiles and allowing for any damaged solar panels to be easily replaced.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago

Why would you do that? It's easier to install solar for one home than for multiple homes at once. If you mash together multiple tenants and homeowners into one energy system, you start having a lot of additional problems. They have to finance the installation together, they have to do contracts about who gets what amount of power when, they have to do billing, and so on. If you have your own solar system on your own roof, that's easy. Everything else is simply not happening. So for example, what happens when one homeowner doesn't want to have solar or can't afford it?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 hours ago

and makes every roof uglier.

Tbh, solar panels are not the ugly factor in thenpicture you posted.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

So, whose roof is going to get drilled all over the place risking leaks in the future? Yours? Also, individual installation costs are lower, as you wouldn't have to lay lines linking the houses, making and closing trenches, etc. One big inverter is a single point of failure. Again, in your house, or build a shed to house it?

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago

What are you talking about? It's a solved problem to install solar on an European roof. We have millions of installations without any leaks. Those companies do know what they are doing and have been for decades. And people have installed stuff on their roofs for centuries.

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Everyone's roof is getting drilled, says the new requirement - I'm suggesting reducing the drilling. Of course the three without installations would compensate the one carrying everything for them.

All houses are linked by the electrical grid already, no new trenches needed.