Why would they, that's what a lot of journalism is like today. It's post modernism. No such thing as facts, it's all opinion and all opinions are equal.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

but some opinions are more equal than others.

-napoleon

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because Nazis think they have the right to dictate what is news.

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I want to read facts, all the facts, not selected facts. Everyone should have access to all the facts. That way they can make informed decisions.

asking people their feelings is not a news event, it's a human interest story ( and is important too of course, )

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago

I don't care what a Nazi wants.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Everyone should have access to all the facts. That way they can make informed decisions.

I agree with the general sentiment, although on the other hand, when there are well-funded propaganda machines at play (including think tanks and corporate-owned publishers), it's possible to flood the zone with misleading facts.

A sad truth is that, due to shortcomings in our education system and the cultural domination of propagandists, there are millions of people who, given access to all the facts, don't have the tools to filter them and make an effective decision. Likewise, you can give me a heap of absolute raw facts about quantum physics or agricultural research or nutritional science or certain sports, and I probably won't have the experience or prerequisite knowledge to use any of it except the most basic parts. At some point, an expert needs to curate this for a general audience and give context. Until people are empowered to process facts effectively, most of us need them selected, and if we choose our news channels poorly, we're at the mercy of those selecting them.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're trying to argue with a Nazi. It's not worth your time.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

If it was a private conversation, I'd agree completely.

Since this is a public forum, and because of how this kind of forum works*, it's useful to refute these platitudes and flawed arguments because there are other people reading. The point isn't to change Seagoon's mind - I've seen their posts long enough to know they're unlikely to read anything in good faith, it wouldn't be worth our time at all.

* I say 'how this kind of forum works', because in some other situations, replying can give pointless attention or legitimacy to bullshit. But I don't think that's an issue here.