this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
320 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

82992 readers
3279 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Would be pretty shitty to make sure every time you are editing Wikipedia to disable any AI based grammar/spellcheckers (e.g Grammarly), and not being allowed to use translation tools.

Because those are the two exceptions.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Spell- and grammar-checking is useless anyway. If you don't have at least one word underlined with red in every sentence, you're not writing anything intellectually serious. 🧐

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why? That’s how they’ve been doing it for 25 years.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Spelling/grammar checking and machine translation have been in use for decades on wikipedia, the only difference is that AI has improved the usefulness of the tools for first-pass editing. I don't believe the policy has even changed - you still had to be fluent in the language if you were using the old style MTL tools, too.

Aside from generating videos of young girls with gigantic titties, this is the only thing generative AI is actually useful for.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I still think it should be banned. It’s prone to just making shit up. Therefore, it’s not useful for any sort of professional work. If you had just a guy named Al, who would work for free, but sometimes would just make stuff up to make you happy, would you let Al work on important things?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

Yeah, and that tendency is directly addressed in the policy.