this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
112 points (98.3% liked)

science

26191 readers
481 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I have a private theory that it’s just fields all the way down. E.g., no electrons (as in separate things), just observable points in the one electromagnetic field. This helps me intuit the idea that energy transfers between things — with “transfer” simply being a kind of interaction between separate fields.

Electrons moving past each other slowing down? Can that be reproduced with an electron gun, or would this be based off a larger mass that includes other subatomic particles as well?

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Fields aren't observable. If I sprinkle some magnetic filings around a magnetic field, I will see the filings move, and even conform to the force lines of the field. But, at the end of the day, what I am seeing is the behavior of the particles, not the field. If all that exists are fields, then reality wouldn't be observable, which clearly contradicts with what we observe.

Of course, you say that there "observable points" added to the field, but I don't see how this is different form just saying that there are particles in the field, since that's basically all a particle is, an observable point. Quite literally. Particles are understood as dimensionless points which are defined in terms of their observables.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Only one way to find out. Fire two election guns at each other and see what happens.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Set one to "stun" and one to "kill". :)