this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
24 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
2380 readers
51 users here now
Tech related news and discussion. Link to anything, it doesn't need to be a news article.
Let's keep the politics and business side of things to a minimum.
Rules
No memes
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think youre misunderstanding one thing, which is that the ice is a replacement for batteries. While the system had a small battery for running a small pump and fan, its a small cheap one that doesn't store much and the water has substantially more energy, equivalent to something like a large lithium battery.
The thermal battery is also far smaller, cheaper, and more robust than a lithium battery and it won't deteriorate with repeated cycling. The obvious trade off is that in this case it can only be used for refrigeration and only down to 0C. So while its very niche, it is quite effective for home air conditioning.
No, I understood that.
The repeated cycling thing is the only advantage I see to this, the ice block will not be smaller than a normal battery array.
Is it?
92kWh/m^3 of energy is a lot of cooling. It'd be hard to not be effective.
source: https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3263&context=publication#%3A%7E%3Atext=These+blocks+of+ice+would%2Cone-ton+block+of+ice.
So a block of ice about the size and weight of a car to cool one house... I'm really just not following how any of this is worthy of attention?
This you?
Because 32 cubic ft is about the volume of most residential AC units.
lol is that the size of your dwelling? That size (4 ft × 4 ft × 2 ft) get's you 12k btus which is not enough for any house lol.