this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
64 points (98.5% liked)

politics

29025 readers
1285 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday defended strikes on Iran’s infrastructure since the U.S. and Israel began their joint war against the country in February, saying “sometimes you have to escalate to de-escalate.”

His comments came just hours after President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social that he was giving Iranian leadership 48 hours to open the Strait of Hormuz or risk U.S. military strikes that “will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!”

Bessent defended Trump’s rhetoric, saying it’s “the only language the Iranians understand.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Bessent is an idiot: he thinks Trump is really clever by using Nixon's madman strategy. What he doesn't realize is that both Trump and the Iranian clerics are genuinely mad.

Anyhow, everybody knew Bessent is an idiot before: a married gay man rooting for Trump and his MAGA cult isn't right in the head.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

While I will not defend the concept of theocracy, the people running Iran are anything but mad.

Brutal and repressive authoritarians? Sure.

But their strategy going back 40 years has been thoughtful and measured, which are not the qualities of people who are "mad".

The same cannot be said for Trump, obviously.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Religious people who are religious enough to forcibly turn their magical thinking into the law of the land on pain of imprisonment or death meet the definition of mad to me.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

You were calling them mad in the context of geopolitical strategic thought i.e. madman theory, and that's just not true.

If you need evidence that they are thoughtful and measured, then just look at this war and how it's playing out.

And if you need more evidence, please read all of the reporting regarding the latest rounds of negotiations that Trump sabotaged.

Those are not the actions of mad men.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

He's going to be so confused if/when this shitty cult annuls his marriage and sends him off to some xtian reeducation camp to "cure" his gayness.