this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
109 points (99.1% liked)

Memes of Production

1411 readers
1726 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Every human that grew up in this world and still has even an ounce of compassion and solidarity in them is the living evidence of that conclusion.

Also, do you think you yourself have to be forved to behauve reasonable?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh, I believe that individual humans are capable of treating other humans with compassion and otherwise being generally well-behaved. There are even people who would sooner die than defend themselves against violence.

But I don't believe that human society at large is capable of existing without violence. I believe that all of our recorded history demonstrates this quite thoroughly.

Also, I will tell you that you don't know what you yourself are capable of until you've gone more than three days without food with uncertainty about when or how you're going to eat next (fasting by choice, which you know will end with the opportunity to eat again, doesn't count).

[–] cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

But I don’t believe that human society at large is capable of existing without violence.

Agreed. Anarchists don't claim to be able to eliminate violence. That would be almost impossible.

Also, I will tell you that you don’t know what you yourself are capable of until you’ve gone more than three days without food...

I also agree with you here. This is part of the reason anarchists believe there would be less violence under anarchy. Withholding food from another person would not be allowed, as that would be a form of hierarchical authority. Food is withheld from millions of people in our current system simply because they cannot afford it.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is part of the reason anarchists believe there would be less violence under anarchy. Withholding food from another person would not be allowed,

Er, and who would enforce this?

[–] cobalt32@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Also, the measures necessary to enforce it at large scale would probably be unethical.

I believe what you are referring to there is a state. States enforce laws at a large scale. All anarchists oppose the existence of states.

Er, and who would enforce this?

It is everyone's responsibility to oppose hierarchical authority wherever it appears. There are probably hundreds of ways to do this, and some methods will work better than others depending on the situation. The rapid response networks in Minneapolis are a great example of this.

[–] for_some_delta@beehaw.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have grown up near and worked in orchards, potatoes, beef and dairy cows. Even with that experience, I do not tell experts how to do their work. Workers are better at managing resources than bosses who haven't spent a day in the field.

Food is wasted due to being commercially unviable. There were potatoes that were too big left to rot in a field. The potatoes were bagged by the community separate from the commercial entity and handed out as gifts. I produce too much fruit to preserve and have to give it away. Gift economies predate capitalism.

I find the argument strange that under anarchy there would be no technology or infrastructure. The form may be different to decentralize power. Technology and infrastructure under capitalism is designed to benefit the capital class.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Workers are better at managing resources than bosses who haven't spent a day in the field.

But a worker who works in e.g. growing potatoes is not better at managing distribution across multiple counties. Those are different task areas, and logistics networks are not flat organizations, they require management.

If you'll re-read my previous post you'll see that my point is mostly about infrastructure, not about the expertise in producing any particular food. It's the infrastructure that allows production and distribution scale, to the point where agriculture represents ~1% of labor. A lot of people (99%) are able to spend their time doing other productive things besides growing food, and are still able to eat. That is a highly successful system.

Food is wasted due to being commercially unviable.

Food is also wasted due to logistics problems. It's great that you can produce so much food that you can give some of it away, but can you give some of it away two states over? The people who would most benefit from the excess food you produce don't live in your zip code.

I find the argument strange that under anarchy there would be no technology or infrastructure.

  1. I said nothing about technology. I'm addressing that here and I'm going to ignore it as a straw man.
  2. Infrastructure never works as a flat organizational structure. It requires management and oversight. It requires overall design, a broad range of skillsets, and long-term maintenance. At some point someone has to make decisions about which experts put their expertise where and when, and which spare parts are most critical for which areas, and you cannot wait for the entire community affected by those decisions to make a collective decision. The infrastructure will rot before useful choices are made. Someone (one) must make management decisions about where other people spend their time and effort on which resources.