this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
190 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82830 readers
4796 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think it is unenforceable? Australia already enforces a ban on these dolls and arrests anyone attempting to import them.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I believe they meant it wasn't easy to consistently enforce, for the reasons they mention.

Australia might be doing this, but it doesn't change that it's all arbitrary and impossible to prove in court outside of the "best judgement" call argument, which is by definition inconsistent.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

That, and the fact they're playing tag with people trying to sell it, which are breaking down these dolls into parts and selling them separately. And what for? In the end it's just an object which sales ban won't solve any real issues.

If it was for free, I'd consider supporting it. But it has a cost, it's subjective (to some extent), and has no tangible benefit other than making some people feel good about themselves.