this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
171 points (87.0% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
2945 readers
742 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's totally in good faith when Israelis talk about how awful Hamas is on LGBT+ rights or when Americans do the same shit over Iran. You're definitely not just carrying water for imperialism.
I'm sure the people whose struggle you're so concerned about will thank you as they can't afford bread due to sanctions and their family is eviscerated by bombs.
It's funny how I'm not even talking about Hamas, which I don't view as much of a state, and more of a militia operation? Ik they're technically the elected government but?
I'm talking about large scale world governments specifically. I'm not condemning mostly powerless people struggling for their lives.
It's the same mechanism. When you say "Actually Iran/Cuba/Venezuala/China/other place the US wants to starve and/or bomb is bad", you're just carrying water for imperialism. It's genuinely more harmful than when the right tries to justify those actions because it tricks people who would otherwise support those people into supporting hostile actions against them in the name of opposing their government.
The grossest part is that the people making these assertions never know what they're talking about and genuinely don't care beyond its utility as hostile evidence. Showing some lemmitor who thinks Cuba hates gays or isn't democratic their latest constitution doesn't shock them that they've been mislead and result in any change in position, instead they just forget that bit of trivia and move on, sure they're helping somebody by supporting America's hostile actions against them.
Why don't you take this opportunity to post evidence of common misconceptions for other readers? /gen
Maybe I'm coming around on China, it's the only one of those I would disagree with. So try to dispel some of my opinions on the Ugyhur situation. I got banned from .ml last night so I didn't get to finish my fun argument.
I lived in Urumqi for a few months (also met some Ugyhurs when I was living in Kazakhstan).
I can't dispel them if I don't know the specifics, but in general, what you hear in western media is either made up or taken wildly out of context.
Until the 2010s, there were significant issues with terrorism, with riots happening in Urumqi. There's still a few glass panels you can see where it doesn't quite match the rest of the underpass entrance or whatever. The government responded by 1. absolutely massive economic development projects, from wind farms to greenbelts and infrastructure, 2. Increased affirmative action, so a lot more Uhygurs were going to college in Beijing and Shanghai, and 3. sending basically anyone convicted of any crime to a job-training facility, the idea being that people who have jobs would be less disenfranchised and harder to radicalize. It was generally successful in that there's been fewer terrorist attacks and a lot more economic development among the Ugyhur population, but 3 was unpopular enough they wound that down in the late 2010/early 2020s. Other measures to stop the terrorist attacks include hiring a shitton of police and security guards. Every mall, apartment building, and hotel has at least 1, sometimes 2 60 year old guards on their phones. They often can't read or speak mandarin fluently.
Orthogonal to this there's a sort of racist/patriarchal attitude you see from some Han people the government tries to address somewhat with anti-discrimination laws.
There's a struggle in Xinjiang (and much of China) about how to bring intangible aspects of cultures into modernity, often it's resolved through creating a commercialized version of the thing that can sustain itself in a market economy. I have mixed feelings here.
How can 3 be anything more than effectively being labor camps? Can you personally or do you know someone personally that attests to whether they had a choice? Whether there were protections in place? Whether these were all fairly deemed "criminals"? What were their crimes? I think I saw someone use the figure 1million? There's just no way that can be ethical, right?
Because they're primarily about training them for a job when they get out.
I never actually met anyone who had been sent to one, and only a couple people even vaguely knew what I was talking about to explain more. To be clear I only know a handful of phrases in Uhygur and Mandarin, most of these conversations happened via google translate, often after a few drinks. I'd usually approach the subject by asking about history and how things have changed over their lifetime, proceeding to "There's more police than anywhere else I've been in China" "did you hear what the western media is saying" and see what they felt like talking about.
They were deemed criminals by the justice system. I have only slightly more faith in the Chinese justice system than other country's, but 1. acab, obviously some innocent people got caught up, and 2. Petty crime shouldn't result in people getting taken away from their family for months.
Yeah no any figures you see estimated by western media either comes from Adrien Zenz's ass or redditors drawing red circles around random buildings on google earth.
It wasn't, people were getting punished by spending months away from their family over petty crime. That's why they stopped it.
I mean. According to who?
So it sounds like they were being over policed and didn't really personally know the extent of it because they weren't deemed criminals and weren't directly affected?
Okay cool.
I got that figure from someone defending China over it iirc so I'm guessing it's accurate if you don't know offhand.
Okay so they stopped it? Does that mean I'm supposed to go back to trusting the government? How do you square that?
Additionally: if a significant portion of the population was imprisoned, especially systematically by race, held against their will, and people were dying as a result of that, I would say that is the beginnings of a genocide. Just like how America is currently perpetuating Black genocide imo. Even if they didn't fully commit or succeed, I can't just go back to trusting that system.
The purpose of the program was to create people who can get jobs and be integrated into the economy. Making someone spend months doing hard labor isn't useful for decreasing terrorism and increasing economic development.
Yes
They mostly chalked it up to the crime and terrorism. They didn't have much a response to "but it's safe now, why are there still so many cops".
Nobody said you should trust the Chinese government, I said you should not trust the US government or help them justify hostile action against foreign countries.
The Uhygur people have their own struggles, that are entirely alien to the stories cooked up in western media.
That's 1 in 20 Uhygurs, I feel like it would have had a more pronounced effect and at that scale, I wouldn't run into people who seemed to have no idea it happened.
I'm pretty confident that didn't happen.
Just like it's totally okay to be a raging alcoholic who attacks random people on the Internet for opinions they do not hold.