this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
378 points (95.9% liked)

memes

20814 readers
1540 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Art is money laundering for the rich.

It all make sense now, doesn't it?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Throw back to Banksy setting a trap in 2006, and springing it 12 years later:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/watch-14-million-bansky-painting-shred-itself-soon-it-sold-180970486/

"We’ve been Banksy-ed," Alex Branczik, Sotheby’s head of European Contemporary art said in a press conference after the incident. “I’ll be quite honest, we have not experienced this situation in the past, where a painting is spontaneously shredded upon achieving a record for the artist.”

Now that... that's fuckin' art right there.

I love the rest of the article entirely missing the point of Banksy doing that being a surprise.

There, you idiots, frame that image.

[–] Woolu@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They keep referring to Banksy as "he." We don't know if Banksy is male or female though, correct?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

~~As far as I know that's correct, nobody knows who Bansky actually is.~~

... Is what I was going to say.

What astoundingly serendipitous timing.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/global-art-banksy/

TL:DR

First posted on the 13th, picked up by other media roughl 6 hours ago, Reuters released a special investigative report, and they believe Bansky is:

... are you sure? ...

Robert Del Naja, the frontman of Massive Attack.

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Small correction:

SpoilerThey actually go on, in that Reuters article, to say it isn't Del Naja, but instead David Jones. The Del Naja bit is kind of a red herring. David Jones, formerly Robin Gunningham, as long suspected. The Wikipedia page has already been updated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm going to go with 'Aha! I did an intentional misdirect!'

... yep. Mhm.

(cough)

derp

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

The article was fun to read, so I fully accept that explanation! ;P

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

So how is he laundering money now with it?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This fake art for sure, and so much that people start to think monetary value is what is important in art.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There was an experiment where someone set up a high class shoe store in a nice location. They took cheap shoes from discount stores and marked them way up and put them on some nice display racks. People bought them.

Expensive = good...to some people.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

Genius! When they come back to complain about the craftsmanship or return them, the place will have never existed.

Checkmate, bourgeoise. XD