this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
49 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

816 readers
452 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
49
submitted 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by plinky@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
 

https://rentahuman.ai/

lmao, i expect they will leak their database faster than advertizing exec thinks about it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Hm. Thus techno-feudalism just sounds like regular feudalism with extra steps. How long until we have robo-knights who hire human squires to oil them up and charge their batteries?

[โ€“] ComradeRat@hexbear.net 5 points 5 hours ago

Feudalism (before markets began dominating it from 1200-1500) had job security, social security provisions, popular control over village life, village influence over production, and a physically present lord who could be beaten to death with a shovel or have their big house burn down if they were too much of an asshole.

No matter how much tech gets added or rent is sought, it continues to be the capitalist mode of production. Money-rent is a bourgeois mode of appropriating a part of the produced surplus value. Undet feudalism, rent would be in kind, and based on negotiated tradition, not dictated by market rates. And in the feudal.mode of production, there would be no production of surplus value, only the production of surplus products