this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9032 readers
453 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, he's not wrong about the first part. AI is fucking with humanities. I don't see how AI is going to help the male vocational working class though.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

It "helps" by thinking life is a zero sum game. If educated females lose, obviously that's a win for uneducated males.

Realistically it's just a lie to say that someone will be a winner other than just the guy with all the marbles.

[–] Whirlygirl9@kbin.earth 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

this is assumption on my part but, what I'm hearing is... AI will replace jobs for smart women, AI will have a more difficult time replacing physical labor jobs more often held by men...

[–] TiredTiger@lemmy.ml 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The implication being that these now-unemployed women will enter into relationships with the blue-collar men to survive. The Epstein class certainly seems to be going all-in on traditional gender roles. Anything to get their human cattle breeding again, I suppose.

[–] Whirlygirl9@kbin.earth 4 points 6 hours ago

ew...i hate how right you are lol

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I think it's more just pandering to right-wing chuds because Karp is trying to win them over.

He may also be lost in the sauce of misogyny.