this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)
Manitoba
404 readers
33 users here now
A space to discuss news and events in Manitoba, Canada.
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
Noteworthy Links
Banner credit: Travel Manitoba
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Notice how elegantly this illustrates the Principle that
THEN
THAT is why the more powerful our technology is AND the more-crowded our world is, the more our own responsibilities embiggen & our self-centered rights ensmallen,
& the responsibilities of civilization-as-a-whole AND the rights of civilization-as-a-whole both embiggen, see?
It isn't an ideological or political question, at all!
It's simply a systems principle.
No "flag" or "identity" or "ideology" changes it!
It just is!
Any person being the sole bush-person living on an entire continent, can be as irresponsible as they want, & Nature will simply erase them, when they're gone.
But civilization, enforced through industrial-technology, can BREAK Nature's viability, planetwide.
This is why The Great Filter ( the next 6-decades of ever-escalating global deathmatch )
FORCES world-species to choose between REACTING ( ideology/prejudice/assumption-river-aka-"religion"-including-atheist-fundamentalism ) vs Correct-Reasoning paradigm!
IF populations won't accept that systems-principles rule, THEN .. populations enforce self-extinguishment.
At any scale, all the way up to ALL of humankind.
It's our own self-centered ignorance, that is the real opponent of our species' viability, nothing "other".
How cleanly this example illustrates the principle.
Beautiful.
_ /\ _
I don’t know if I understood everything you’re saying here but I think I got the gist of it. Basically, individuals acting alone without the aid of technology can be assholes without wide spread negative consequences. But these same selfish tendencies, when found in large groups aided by technology, can cause a lot damage. Is that a fair summary?