https://github.com/egg82/fetcharr
Disclaimer: I am the developer
Long story short, after Huntarr exploded I still wanted an app that did the core of Huntarr's job: find and fetch missing or upgradable media. I looked around for some solutions but didn't like them for various reasons. So, I made my own.
No web UI, configured via environment variables in a similar manner to Unpackerr. It does one job and it does it (a little too) well. Even when trying a few different solutions for a few days each, Fetcharr caught a bunch of stuff they all missed almost immediately. This is likely due to the way it weights media for search.
Since you made it this far, a few notes:
- I did still use ChatGPT on a couple of occasions. They're documented and entirely web UI - no agents. Anything it gave me was vetted and noted in the code before publishing.
- The current icon is temporary and LLM-generated. I've put out some feelers to pay an artist to create an icon. Waiting to hear back.
- It's written in Java because that's the language I'm most familiar with. SSL certs in Java containers can be painful but I added some code to make it as easy as Python requests or Node
- While it still has a skip-if-tagged-with-X feature, it doesn't create or apply any tags. I didn't find that portion necessary, despite other popular *arrs using it. Not sure why they do, even after developing this.
- Caution is advised when first using it on a large media collection. It'll very likely pick up quite a number of things initially if you weren't on top of things beforehand. Just make sure your pipeline is set up well, or you limit the number of searches or lengthen the amount of time between searches using the environment variables.
> “not vibecoded”
> looks inside
> vibecoded
Not sure what you mean by that. I occasionally use the web UI as the tool that it is and I've played around with opencode, cursor, etc previously on other home projects to get a sense for where things are and what the limits of these things are. That said, I take pride in my own work and this project is no exception. Is there something in this project that makes you think I threw a prompt into cursor and am passing that off as my own? Or are you against the idea of using an LLM and consider any person or project using them at all to be vibecoded?
As a quick edit, I'll note that, since I documented any use of ChatGPT reasonably well in this project, you can see the number of times it was used and what it provided. I feel the contributions were largely inconsequential and really just time-saving on my end. I also vetted (and understood!) the output and modified it according to what I wanted. Personally, I don't consider that to be "vibe-coding" but I suppose everyone has their own definition.
Edit again: ugh, it's far too easy to focus on negative feedback and let that consume you. I am not going to defend my use of ChatGPT but I personally think that someone seeing the word ChatGPT and saying "oh so this is vibe-coded" is disingenuous to the project and my skills as a developer. I spent years learning and mastering Java and this is a lot of my experience and several weekends of my free time. Look, if you feel that the four uses of ChatGPT, much of which have been modified by my own hand and all of which inconsequential, constitutes a vibe-coded system then that's your take - but I don't think it's a fair take. There are many things to be said about the ethics of modern LLMs and over-reliance on them but personally I think understanding and effectively using tools at your disposal is a skill. If you want something completely free of LLMs these days you may very well have to invent the universe.
Phew. Okay, I'm off my soap-box. Consider me got. I'll try not to think about this too hard but it definitely feels bad pouring your time and skills into a thing and seeing that one comment saying "nah this isn't worth anything"