this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
119 points (97.6% liked)

UK Politics

5390 readers
160 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/33694

Starmer attempts to make up with the warmongering US president as tens of thousands protest against the bombing of Iran over the weekend


From Morning Star via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

why do they keep mentioning world war 3? who plans on joining? china? is it just china they're worried about?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Cart before the horse there. Two-sidedness is something that tends to crop up in world wars, but it's not how they seem to begin.

So far they seem to begin by multiple concurrent conflicts yes, and-ing each other until every large entity is involved. When the fate of Taiwan might depend on what happens in Iran, and the fate of the Baltics depends on how well Ukraine defends against Russia, what do you call that if not a world at war?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

China and Taiwan have been on the map for ages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidson_window

The concept gained widespread attention following CIA Director William J. Burns' 2023 statement that, according to U.S. intelligence, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Xi Jinping had instructed the People's Liberation Army to be ready for a Taiwan invasion by 2027.[2]

Europe has been at war with Russia since 2022

what do you call that if not a world at war?

You're right, it'd be a world at war but I wouldn't classify it as a 'world war' unless China plans on invading Europe or America or is it just over the island themselves?

I think it'd involve more than a big war over Taiwan or Ukraine, these would just be big proxy wars

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think we can be that clinical about the strict definition of a world war when we only have two examples to work from. We could end up with half the world economy spent on war and still be calling it proxy wars all the way down.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean if there's only 2 countries being invaded: Ukraine and Taiwan and everyone is fighting through them it doesn't feel like we here in the western world are really on the brink

It won't really feeeel like a world war to me until Europe or America or Australia etc are actually getting invaded, it's just a large glorified proxy war

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, come on. Does it feeeel like there are several concurrent genocides happening at this moment?

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

The first world war was started by two bullets in Sarajevo.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

If anything I'd expect China to take the opportunity to expand their own borders rather than join in on someone else's war.