this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
465 points (97.9% liked)
Comic Strips
22631 readers
945 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Limit of two posts per person per day.
- Bots aren't allowed.
- Banned users will have their posts removed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
These sort of people crack me up, because every one of them hates e-bikes because they're ”cheating". Like, dudes, we're not racing. There are a lot of hills by my house and I would literally never ride a bike if I didn't have some help going up them.
I don't see how having a motor to help you out and spending a few grand on a carbon fiber frame are much different. It's all just making it easier for you.
I ride fixed distances (25 and 50 miles). Any improvements to the efficiency of my bikes means I'll just get less of a workout each time. Why pay (so much) more just to get less exercise?
If you're asking why pay for an ebike to get less of a workout, i think the framing of the question is wrong: you get an ebike because less exercise vs a normal bike is still more exercise than driving
I'm not talking about e-bikes, I'm talking about insanely expensive regular bikes where you pay extra thousands of $$$ to shave grams off the bike's weight.
Ahhhh okay yeah that makes more sense.
Tbh i don't get it either, unless you're doing Olympic training why does it matter
It doesn't matter, it's a sport. All sport/games are about overcoming unnecessary obstacles within some arbitrary rules. They're not training for the Olympics but they're playing the same game: electric motors aren't allowed in the Olympics so they don't use them.
As for why they get annoyed at others using electric motors I have no idea: It's like if a chess player got annoyed if they saw someone playing checkers 😅
I agree, that's why I stopped lubing my bike chain and leave my tires at 30 psi low (well that's for glass and nails, but h workout is a free bonus)
Some people cycle as a sport, and races don't let you have e-bikes. Plus, putting in all the work to climb a hill under your own power and getting to ride down is rewarding. Sure, getting a carbon fiber bike makes the work a bit lighter, but you're still the one putting in all the work, which isn't the case with e-bikes.
While the people in your example are failing to understand that people habe different motives for cycling, you're doing the exact same thing here.