Technology

2313 readers

113 users here now

Tech related news and discussion. Link to anything, it doesn't need to be a news article.

Let's keep the politics and business side of things to a minimum.

Rules

No memes

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

rimu@piefed.social

Many more US states are planning or already have operating system age verification laws (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 1 day ago by ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@piefed.social

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a blog post Richell notes that the New York version as far worse since it "explicitly forbids self-reporting and leaves the allowed methods to regulations written by the Attorney General" and so developers of operating systems and devices would have to have more than just your date of birth to put you into some age bracket like the California law seems to allow.

These types of laws seem to be popping up around the US. How long until this plague spreads to other countries?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ftumch@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

These laws are stupid. If you want to protect kids, you should focus on getting parents the tools they need to lock down their kids' devices however they see fit.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

That is kinda the point of the California one. The parents identify the device as belonging to a child when setting it up. There is no verification past asking for a date. The Illinois law also appears to be constructed in this way (I may have missed something though). The New York and Texas ones seem to require ID though the wording is vague. Utah and Louisiana outright require verification. Interestingly Louisiana's law explicitly considers children married under 18 not to be minors for the purposes of the law.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 21 points 1 day ago

If you want to protect kids

They don't.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

If you want to protect kids, you wouldn't let a couple random adults dictate their life, body, education, and web access just because they happened to give birth to them

[–] Ftumch@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

And it's downright fiendish that a 100% imaginary thing like money decides who lives and who dies, but that's the world we live in.

It's not that you're wrong, it's just that there are very few paths to a better solution. Perhaps the local people's militia should take all children at birth and raise them? Until that time it'd be neat if parents had a simple, affordable way to stop their eight-year-old from seeing hardcore pornography.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

It's sad that people who don't know what it's like will probably disagree with you, and to be honest I do not have a entirely better solution as it feels like it requires positive intent not specific stipulations (Russia and North Korea for example take it to the other side of the extreme). The width and depth of the human experience remains one of it's worst characteristics. 🫠