this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
58 points (98.3% liked)

politics

28745 readers
1974 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn) shared his reaction with reporters following the briefing: “I’m more convinced now that this is going to be open-ended and forever.”

He added, “This feels like a multitrillion-dollar open-ended conflict with a very confusing and constantly shifting set of goals. They clearly seem fine with hard-line elements being in control of the country, because they plan to permanently run air operations in order to chase [Iran’s] missile-making capability, drone-making capability, and nuclear capabilities.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So if Iran is showing off their underground bunkers full of drones, whats to stop them from moving manufacturing there. Why wouldn't it already be there? How do you destroy that?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Supply chain. Drones are complicated pieces of equipment, they can't possibly be manufacturing all of the components locally.

During WWII the Allies brought the German tank corps to a halt by bombing ball bearing factories.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hasn't Iran been under embargo for decades now? They must produce most of their stuff locally since it would be hard for them to import it.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

China and Russia both trade heavily with Iran and don't care about embargoes.

Also even if they could produce everything they need within the country, that doesn't mean it's practical to produce it all in one location. At some point you have to pull raw material out of the ground and refine it, and you probably can't get everything you need all from the same hole in the ground. You probably can't manufacture electronics very well next door to a mining and refining operation. There's going to be truck routes or train lines and logistics facilities somewhere.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I get that war interrupts supply chains, but you can't really bomb a supply chain. So what's the goal, some sort of hostile presence forever? Or are you saying that this might escalate into the US bombing China or Russia?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 8 hours ago

you can't really bomb a supply chain

Fuck yeah you can, hence my example of bombing ball bearing factories.

Train lines are also a classic bombing target. Fuel production/refining/storage/transport, any kind of logistics hub, shipyards, airstrips, warehouses... all things that are difficult to hide because there's always activity around them. Flatten them and the dependent supply chain grinds to a halt.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

can’t possibly be manufacturing all of the components locally

Ukraine has entered the chat