this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
427 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

2090 readers
1429 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 18 points 21 hours ago (34 children)

Looks nice. Why they don't sell PCs with cooling like that? What are the downsides?

[–] ManaYoodSushai@feddit.org 63 points 21 hours ago (12 children)

I would guess that the low surface area would lead to problems. At first it would cool very well because of the huge thermal mass, but once it reaches thermal equilibrium the cooling would be quite weak.

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

how long till it reaches thermal equilibrium? maybe it can endure a full load for an hour

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 17 hours ago

Your mom can endure a full… oh never mind.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

You're looking at about a half hour per kilogram of copper to raise it by 50 °C with 100W of heat.

Actual delta from ambient to thermal limit will typically be a little higher than that, but so is processor wattage on mid-to-high performance CPUs, so I'm happy enough with that as a ballpark estimate.

Someone else estimated that block as 4.5kg, so you've got something close to two and a half hours of cooling from an ambient start.

[–] ManaYoodSushai@feddit.org 2 points 18 hours ago

I was wondering about this too, but I'm not an engineer so I would have to look up how to calculate this

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)