this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23234 readers
221 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Signal is good, end-to-end encrypted, probably the best bet for an accessible secure option. Open-source, group chats, good calls, has very functional desktop + mobile apps, a variety of options for enhanced security (eg disappearing messages, extra-hops for call obscurity).
Stoat(/revolt) is open source, meaningfully secure, and very Discord-like. However, servers are not end-to-end encrypted and it's EU-hosted. Video calls are still beta.
Element does tick the boxes. Personally I've run into too many bugs and confusing issues to like using it.
WhatsApp very deliberately harvests all your metadata (though theoretically technically not chat contents (though who believes that)), it will harvest and log times you're online, when you send and receive chats, possibly even the length of those chats. This data is frequently subpeonad. I would not use it for anything secure ever.
I would ABSOLUTELY not recommend Signal for org work. Personal communication, sure, but org infrastructure should be self-hosted, and MUST NOT require PII (phone numbers) for access.
It is better than SMS, but not sufficient. It has all of the same vulnerabilities as WhatsApp from an architectural point of view. Their reputation, and the availability of free software clients is the only major difference.
Very good point, honestly I'd forgotten about the Phone number link.