this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
1343 points (97.7% liked)

Fediverse

37764 readers
89 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.fmhy.ml 133 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I don't really get what the hate was for Google+, it was better than the alternative/competitor at the time (Facebook)

[–] TheyKeepOnRising@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Google+ forced itself on people. I didn't want it so I stopped using my Gmail entirely. I imagine word of mouth caused people to avoid it.

[–] yourgodlucifer@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Yea I was annoyed that they were making me sign up for google+ for my youtube account so I never tried it I just set it up so I could keep using youtube.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Google wasn’t comfortable in letting it grow naturally over time. They tried really hard to push on people by combining it with other more popular google products when it didn’t really make sense (i.e. Youtube). Also, as a teen at the time google plus just felt nerdy and weird. It didn’t really feel like something they cool kids would use so no one used it.

[–] R51@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah that's how I felt too. I remember being excited about g+, then I also remember aggressively turning off any association to g+ because no one was on it and it kept pushing it in my face. Come to think of it gmail was similar, invite only and that, but it wasn't forced even at release and they made it look a lot nicer than what yahoo and hotmail had going on at the time.

[–] knightry@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

For a while, Google bonuses were tied to social integration. That's why you saw the huge influx of insanity.

[–] debounced@kbin.run 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and from what i remember, staying true to typical google fashion, they fucked it up by not opening up the "beta" when they had a critical mass forming behind it. then only to force everyone into having a profile a year or whatever later. lol, too late. i think most of us understood that anything associated with google is assumed to be a never-ending "beta", so no idea what they were thinking or waiting for.

[–] MetalFingers@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think it was definitely the super long beta period where you needed an invite killed it. I knew a ton of people who were interested that gave up

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's easy to say now, but Orkut (another Google social network, mostly used in Brazil) also had a beta invite system... And that helped it grow tremendously. The secrecy and "status" of getting invited made people go wild - they would even sell invites.

The strategy can work. It's just very timing sensitive.

[–] adude007@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Orkut was young when Facebook access was still restricted to college kids only. Google+ was dumb. You’d get and then it was just tumble weeds.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if I'm mis-remembering, but I believe my first Gmail account was by invitation. It was pretty much just an email account back then

[–] meteotsunami@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Correct, I got my account invite from The Screensavers show with Kevin Rose. They were giving them out randomly to viewers.

[–] Jeze3D@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Reminds me of Bluesky which is also in a permanent beta.

[–] crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It was definitely much better than Facebook at the time. Especially the concept of circles that they implemented.

[–] axtualdave@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

It was invite only for too long, and then, suddenly, it was required for everything Google.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago

Poorly supported, forced integration with other google services, facebook was good enough TM for most.

[–] cyrusg@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It was good but it didn’t really add enough or solve an actual problem. At the time, there wasn’t as much negative sentiment around Facebook. The circles were a neat concept but too much work to use for the average user.

[–] Erk@cdda.social 3 points 2 years ago

It's strange to note that if Google had just casually worked on the feature, started gradually integrating it with YouTube etc, they might have beat insta to the punch and also really capitalized on Facebook hate. Instead they made one massive marketing blunder after another.

[–] talung@lemmy.talung.org 11 points 2 years ago

I agree, and the level of user on G+ was of a techy IT variety of person. It was great and you could have good conversations. Lemmy really has that feel now. Enjoy it till either the general public gets hold of it and it turns into a cesspool or it slowly dies a death.

Personally I hope to face neither of those scenarios, but history is not on our side.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Google mismanaged the shit out of it, which is a shame, because it really was a good platform.

[–] ConditionOverload@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I liked it a lot, honestly. Was a very cool community and Google's app for it was awesome. The web interface was great too.

[–] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The concept of who you chose to share your status was cumbersome. It at least not auntie or uncle friendly

I don't remember what it was called? Spaces?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don’t remember what it was called? Spaces?

Circles. It was a killer feature at the time, the idea of different feeds for different groups, all in one profile. Too bad there weren't enough groups to make it useful.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

Being able to share certain posts with everyone (including your parents/grandparents) vs just your friends vs your work colleagues was a brilliant feature that seems to have just been substituted with private group chats instead. Seriously when I was a teenager the amount of stuff I thought about posting but didn't because it would appear for everyone...

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I still miss Google plus so much... It had the most intelligent groups of people I've ever experienced on social media both then, and now.