this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
521 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

83032 readers
3092 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mech@feddit.org 82 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They're a great idea if you happen to own a company making AI, a company making rockets, and a company controlling public opinion.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I envision a future so shitty that people are willing to physically destroy data centers in self-defense. Putting them in space is a really good way to combat that.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Putting them in space also puts them technically outside of the legal jurisdiction of any country. I figure fElon probably assumes that means said servers can never be subpoenaed.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean a data center barge or one in Antarctica would do much the same and be wildly cheaper and (relatively) more practical.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

But those aren't as "cool"

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Subpoena the ground stations if that was true?

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh yeah it's totally a bullshit argument, it wouldn't hold water in any court. Hell if nothing else, the ground stations like you said, or the country whose airspace the center exists over, would be in jurisdiction.

But I do believe that Musk believes it's a get out of jail free card.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. The US can access/subpoena any data it wants from US companies, even if the servers they host the data on are in Europe or Asia or...

It doesn't matter where the servers and the data is located. It matters who posses (or controls the access) to it.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh great, AI generated CSAM from space....

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Putting data centers in space is a good way to keep people from destroying them. Thermodynamics on the other hand, will have a field day with them.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Keep people from destroying data centers by having them destroy themselves? Is this some sort of zen koan?

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Have to destroy the rockets that are used to maintain them then and just wait.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

They aren't maintained. They're a constellation of small satellites in LEO like starlink that just go up and eventually come down.

If they're too far up latency would be too high

No one is repairing any of these starlink type dishes.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wasn't it recently proven that the metals introduced into the upper atmosphere by satellites burning up depletes ozone? Its not a problem yet but maintaining constellations on the scale of cumulative several gigawatts of data centre would leave several tons of satellite burning up every single day. CFC Ozone hole is gonna look like a cloudy day in comparison.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think anything was proven yet, but something came out saying it warranted more studying?

Satellites might need to be redesigned around it in the future and more studies should be done.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I just wanted to add another note

Even if this ozone thing turns out to not be true, there are still all sorts of other things being burned up in the atmosphere that can have other potential effects. It all needs to be studied given the size of these constellations.

I wouldn't be surprised if 50-60 years from now, if there is a real issue, that it eventually comes out that SpaceX or other mega constellation companies figured out it would be a problem, and just said nothing. Much like how big oil new CO2 was a problem forever ago and hid it.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Pastry in spaaace! Still, eventually they will stop working.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

That's an insightful way of putting it, 10 points.

[–] totesmygoat@piefed.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

And an excellent way to scam a little. And fleece the flock