this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
334 points (100.0% liked)

People Mastodon

370 readers
12 users here now

People tooting stuff. We allow toots from anyone and are platform agnostic (Mastodon, BlueSky, Twitter, Tumblr, FaceBook, Whatever)

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are arguing with someone who is lying to you. You will never "win" this argument or convince them because everything that they say is a lie with a complete different agenda than what they say.
Whether they are a bot or a person, paid or freelance psychopath, they are here to disenfranchise voters and convince young people to throw away their vote on nonsense, or that their vote is essentially meaningless and they shouldn't bother.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. Everything that you don't like to hear is a psyop, sure buddy.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was actually trying to be generous in saying that you had a plan and are doing a psyop... I mean it's painfully obvious that you don't give a shit about your own arguments, and you are obviously not dumb as most of the maga crowd. So if it is not a psyop, then it's some kind of masterbatory thing where you get off on upsetting people or being yelled at and insulted... At that's just gross... Not to cast shade on your kink, you do you king, but gross that you would involve other people in your kink without their knowledge or consent. I mean it makes you nothing more than a public masturbator, or some flasher waving their genitals at random people.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kamala needed to adopt an anti genocide position to win the election. If you weren't advocating for that you weren't advocating to stop fascism. Simple as.

That's the issue you can't contend with, so you resort to ad hominems, claims of people being bots, etc. it's all to distract that you genuinely don't have an answer to the question if how Harris could have win the election if not for changing their position on this issue.

You can be mad and voters for voting against their interests. It's understandable and a valid criticism of voters. But what you can't do is claim that you didn't know that American voters can and will vote against their own interests. They did in 2016, clearly we both agree on that. They damn near voted against their own interests again in 2020, and if not for covid, Trump would have won that election. Relying on voters to simple vote better is political malpractice.

The strategy you are advocating for is that instead of the politician moving to a set of policies that their voters want and accept, we should rely on voters to simply "voter better". But we know Americans don't behave that way. We know you need to positively incentive American voters, especially Democrats, to show up.

The approach you are advocating for lost the 2016 and 2024 elections and handed the entire government to fascists.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kamala needed to grow a penis and be at least half white to win the election with the way the Dems fumbled it. That's what the Democrats learned. They learned that external length of the candidates genitals mattered more than the lives of every Palestinian, more than global warming, more than affordable health care, more than avoiding putting someone who is openly fascist and openly declaring that he will kill anyone who stands against him.

Of course my arguments are ad hominem, that's because your arguments are lies and just as fake as Donald's tan. Your arguments wind around on themselves and eat their own tails. Psyop, psycho, or raging pervert are the only three things left once we eliminate all of the things that you and your arguments are obviously not.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

You sound like a racist, sexist piece if shit with a view of elections that has consistently handed power to Republicans, over decades .

It's a simple fact that is now very well evidenced by even internal DNC post mortems. If Harris would have changed her position, she would have won the election. It's not because she had boobs. It's not because she was black. It's because she supported a genocide while trying to get elected among Democrats.

I'm not sure what you think your crash out here does.