this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
10 points (75.0% liked)

science

25546 readers
412 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If the basic logic of the DSM is flawed, it should be abandoned. Instead, psychiatrists should move towards a system that looks at an individual’s mental experiences in context, alongside their unique developmental vulnerabilities and strengths, as the main source for analysing and responding to their distress. Diagnosis would no longer name a disorder but map what kinds of support, relationships and learning processes are most likely to help a person regain agency, coherence and a sense of future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Worth knowing:

Article's byline is "Jim Van Os" , and the Wikipedia article for someone of the same name is a Dutch psychologist who has a ten-year history of arguing that "schizophrenia" isnt a useful label.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_van_Os

(Of course, as far as I know they may not be the same guy, and I don't have any reason to doubt the sincerity of his argument.)

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Who cares? It's not a useful label. That's the point.

The whole DSM is a pseudo-scientific grift that serves capitalism, hegemony, etc., rather than producing positive results through actual science.

Look at the history of the DSM. It's full of phony bullshit just like it is now.