this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
372 points (99.2% liked)

History Memes

2064 readers
1612 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aknifeguy@piefed.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No you don't see it. It's not a university. And if we open up the definition then you're still wrong because Chinese institutions like the Guozijian and Yuelu Academy are older in origins and represent sophisticated, long-running centers of advanced learning.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No you don’t see it. It’s not a university. And if we open up the definition

Of the two definitions you gave in that comment for a university, one you admitted al-Qarawiyyin clearly was a university under; and the other you concede that it is debatable.

then you’re still wrong because Chinese institutions like the Guozijian and Yuelu Academy are older in origins and represent sophisticated, long-running centers of advanced learning.

You didn't say "It's not the oldest university", you said

In short, it’s not a university.

[–] Aknifeguy@piefed.ca -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

You didn’t say “It’s not the oldest university”.
That's right. The post you posted said that. But it's not even a university until 1963. If you broaden the definition the post is still wrong because Chinese institutions would be the oldest.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

But it’s not even a university until 1963.

...

[–] Aknifeguy@piefed.ca -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Your inability to accept that is the issue. If it was a university before, why would it reform to become classified as one if it already was one? That's right, it wouldn't need to because it would have been considered one already.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago

Your inability to accept that is the issue. If it was a university before, why would it reform to become classified as one if it already was one? That’s right, it wouldn’t need to because it would have been considered one already.

...