this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
586 points (99.5% liked)

Selfhosted

56936 readers
477 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My first gut reaction was "Neat, but no thank you" but the more I think about how many clients COULD be using a cloud hosted privacy respecting platform instead of 365, I quickly bit my lip.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They say in their post that they won't host it.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(IMO) even better.
Give me the package to self-host it.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I agree with that. Give me a container.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yes that's understood and particularly great, leaving orgs/people to self host. I'm all for it.