this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
1136 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

83805 readers
1965 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”

more at: @feed@404media.co

https://tech.lgbt/@yjeanrenaud/116122129025921096

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] highjayhawk@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I agree 100%, but a thought occurred to me…would these help lead to more arrest if assaults were captured on the cameras. It sucks that such an existential threat to privacy could do real good. Forces some moral and ethical issues that that techno feudalism is forcing on us.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Those who would give up any measures of Liberty to purchase any amount of temporary Security deserve neither Liberty or Security.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

would these help lead to more arrest if assaults were captured on the cameras

It might also help find lost puppies, but that's not a good enough reason to give up any additional amounts of privacy to the megacorporations or to a police state.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Everyone around you has a phone with a camera. Businesses and the government have additional cameras looking all over. The phone camera being less obvious and handsfree seems like an arbitrary choice of where to draw the line

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I don't know about you, but when I'm walking around all my phone camera sees is the inside of my pocket. Hands free stealth cameras seems like a perfectly reasonable place to draw the line.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Spy glasses are much less obvious than using a phone camera.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Back to the 1960s....these were marketed to look at kids and girls.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Is unsolved assault cases currently a problem? That sounds like an answer looking for a problem to me.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And I think it just means anyone deciding to commit assault just also steals/ destroys the victims phone and glasses as a default

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

There is no reason for anyone to be walking around and public with hidden cameras.