this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
76 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
808 readers
420 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Him saying the slur is not evidence of his racism. The disability does not force him to vocalize things he subconsciously thinks, it forces him to vocalize things he finds abhorrent and wrong. This is also why he's not calling white people "slurs" as some people have mentioned, because he presumably doesn't think those are taboo because anti-white racism isn't real (correct).
Now, the harm that is done to the black people who were on the receiving end is of course still real. But if this discussion starts with "why should being disabled cancel out being racist" it's fundamentally missing the point of one half of the equation (ableism and disability) and it's not going to accomplish anything.
I also find it extremely troubling that the broadcaster who got to farm controversy by inflicting these slurs on millions of black people while scapegoating disabled people and censoring "free Palestine" is now completely getting away with that while the discourse turns into a war between disabled people and black people, which are of course not at all mutually exclusive categories.